Arvind Kejriwal is threatening Indian democracy

Arvind Kejriwal is threatening Indian democracy by saying that he will disrupt Republic day parade with support of his one lakh goons if his demands are not met. Do we allow anyone who has got one lakh goons to hold nation to ransom? Kejriwal claims that only his goons have right to have opinion and nobody else can have an opinion. In Delhi poll 20 Lakh votes were casted in favor of AAP and 40 Lakh votes were casted against AAP. How come 20 Lakh people are right and 40 Lakh people are wrong as per democracy?

Review of Aam Admi Party's Government

Today I am writing review of Arvind Kejriwal's government in Delhi. Two major decisions he made are not only illogical but illegal also.

1.    First decision is to make 20,000 liter of water free and make person using 20,001 liter to pay for full 20,001 liter. With this decision he is making a person pay for 20,000 liter for consuming 1 liter water because of thrust due to extreme summer of Delhi. Moreover people whose normal consumption is below 20,000 liter will be motivated to waste water. Previous system of charging for water based on consumption right from starting was much better, in that system no one was given undue advantage and no one was penalized for no fault of him. This decision have also increased corruption on the part of meter reader where meter reader can extort money by threatening to give meter reading above 20,000 when meter reading was 19,990 liter. 

2.    Second decision is to reduce electricity charges by 50% upto 400 units and making person pay 100% on these 400 units also if he consumes 401 units. This will increase corruption at meter reader level.

Kejriwal is saying that he will control corruption of meter readers through Lokepal. Corruption can't be controlled by giving people opportunity to do corruption and after that creating a new department to police on him. There is a saying that everyone is corrupt and most corrupt is anti-corruption department. Creating an anti-corruption department does not solve problem of corruption but increases it and lion's share of corruption goes to Lokepal. The only way to remove corruption is by enforcing accountability and strongly dealing with complain of request not being resolved in time.

In contrast I will like to give example of another chief minister who reduced corruption of house tax inspector by empowering people and reducing opportunity for corruption. Earlier property tax on a property was assessed on the bases of value of property perceived by the tax inspector. This subjectivity of assessment was creating a opportunity for corruption and house tax inspectors were using it for extorting money from people. This money was later on extorted by anti-corruption department ( which will now be replaced with Lokpal ). What CM did was to create a category of localities and fix per squire meter rate of house tax. This helped in increasing reach to areas which were beyond reach because of limited workforce. More localities were added to house tax jurisdiction, people were happy to pay justified amount of house tax. The CM who did all this was Sheela Deekshit who is called most corrupt by Aam Admi Party. It is very difficult to prove anyone guilty or innocent in cases of corruption but at least looking at kind of decision Kejriwal and Sheela Deekshit took I will say that Sheela Dekshit's state of mind looks better than Kejriwal's.

As far as personal credibility of Kejriwal goes he is after money right from starting. He collected 90 Lakh rupee in name of Anna at the time of Lokepal movement and diverted all money to his NGO where he can eat all that money because there he is highest authority. This was the reason of rift between Kejriwal and Anna. People thought that Anna had taken their money but in reality Anna got nothing. Kejriwal was paid very high price for campaigning for BJP in GOA and for doing that he did not even remember his duty to cast his vote before going to campaign to urge people to vote for right candidate. He thought that it is below his dignity to stand in line with ordinary people to vote because his job is to tell people whom to vote for and whom not to vote for. When media created a big issue out of it and Kejriwal got a phone call from GOA saying that he will not be paid if he comes without casting his vote, he remembered his duty to cast his vote and returned from Airport to cast his vote to find that his name was not on the voter list. Election commission issues voter list 4 months in advance for review and to file any objections or claim. Why did he not review voter list and filed his claim?           

Aam Admi Party is not disclosing expenditure details because 5 crore is given to Kejriwal for campaign in Delhi

Today I looked at Aam Aadmi Party website in hope of finding details of donations and expenditure. But I was disappointed to see a page where some fifty entries with amount   10 to 1000 being listed there. What I wanted was list of Donner sorted based on money donated but there is no such feature to sort list on basis of amount donated or name of person. Providing sorting on these fields is a five minutes job for any developer. Aam Admi Party don't want to disclose that most of the big money received was from corrupt congress leaders therefore list of Donner sorted based on amount is not provided. 

Even bigger problem was absence of expenditure report. There is no record of expenditure of 20 crore rupee collected. The details of collection are put on website to check party workers so they don't put money which should go to Kejriwal's pocket in their pocket. Once money reach Kejriwal's pocket all transparency ends and no one have any right to ask Ex Income Tax deputy commissioner for expanse report because it is his money and why should he give expanse details to ordinary people?

I have following questions for Aam Admi Party :-   

How much money is spent in the process of collecting money?

How much money is spent on party office? I think AAP spent Rs. 1 on it as per news.

How much money is spent on bringing dancers to delhi and arranging a dance show for Imandar people of Delhi? As per news it was done by dancers for Rs. 1

How much money was spent on purchasing Jhadus for campaining? I think they were given by a trader for Rs. 1

So total expenditure was Rs. 3 so why do they need to raise fund again for the party?

Interpretation of Supreme Court Judgement

Today Supreme Court observed that auction is not the only way to allocate natural resources. Media and congress is projecting it in a totally opposite way than it was intended. 

Supreme court observed that it not governments aim to make maximum profit from natural resources but to make natural resources available to people of India at reasonable cost and the reasonable profit if made from sale of natural resources must be used for public good. Auctioning a natural resource actually make resource expensive for end user. But it does not mean that government can allocate natural resources cheap to companies and allow them to make exorbitant profits by exploiting end user. If government allocates natural resources by means other than auction then there must be a clause which will govern maximum price of this natural resource to end user.

Congress government has allocated natural resources to companies at very low price and allowed them to sell it at maximum price which they can sell it. This is illegal and court has not declared it to be legal. Court have observed that auction as a method of allocating natural resources is also not above judicial scrutiny, and it can be challenged in court.

The media and congress is trying to misled people to break their moral by saying that Supreme Court have accepted government's stand.

Bharat Band today against allowing FDI in retails. What champions of honesty and supporter of Lokepal doing?

Today Bharat Band is organized against opening up FDI in retail sector which will lead to unemployment and poverty of masses. It may beneficial for few real estate dealers but it will led to poverty of India. Same thing was with British rule in India it was benefiting a few Indians and was leading to poverty of masses and the few people who were benefited by British rule were trying to save British rule in India. Today also people who have any hope of getting benefited by FDI in retails are supporting it even if it leads to poverty of masses. Surprisingly these people are educated and having money and are supporter of Lokpal to remove corruption. Is supporting something which benefits them and harm masses not corruption? Should Lokepal not investigate into that?

Lala Lajpat Rai had correctly remarked in INTRODUCTION written for Lala Har Dayal's Book Our Educational Problem in 1922 that "the so-called educated man is more effective a hindrance to our progress in political freedom than his uneducated brother."  

This sentence is applicable now also. So called educated and cultured man are more effective an hindrance on freedom and prosperity of India than the uneducated people in India and these people project and believe that they are a big asset to India. These people have formed a pressure group under leadership of Arvind Kejriwal and declared that all power in India should be transferred to people having IIT degrees and Awards of honesty  given by international organizations interested in uplift of India and no power and authority should be left with representatives of poor uneducated people of India because these people don't know what is right and wrong. The proof of their lack of intellect is that when IIT graduate and winner of international awards of intelligence and honesty Arvind Kejriwal hold a meeting to replace Prime minister of India with him, these illiterate people don't bother to come to his support. These educated people believe that illiterate people of India should not have voting rights and IIT graduates should have 10,000 votes.  This is the only way certified honest and intelligent people can become master of destiny of India.

Should these so called educated and honest people be allowed to fulfill their personal interest by pushing masses of India into poverty?

Amithabh Bachan promote alcohol and discourage reading books

I was watching "Kon Banega Krorepati" on Sun 16th September 2012 and one of the candidate said that he came to know about answer to the questions by reading books and not by watching movies. This comment angered Amitabh Bachan and he did not try to hide his anger and expressed it. The contestant was afraid of getting disqualified from KBC and said that he likes watching Amitabh Bachchan's movies.

In previous session Amitabh Bachan dedicated 10 minutes to praise Sakshi Tanwar's scene in a serial in which she was so drunk that she could not know difference between Sofa and Bed and slept on Sofa instead of Bed. Amitabh Bachan told the audience that Sakhi Tanwar was looking more beautiful in that scene than any other scene. That time channel was not even running message that opinions expressed by people is personal and channel don't subscribe to those opinion. But when contestant was saying that he reads newspaper rather than watching movies channel was running a message that opinion expressed are personal and channel don't subscribe to that.

Amithabh Bachchan thinks that a woman looks beautiful only when she is drunk! This praise of drinking was not required and was not related to any question of KBC but Amitabh Bachchan always find an opportunity to praise alcoholism. He doesn’t allow any contestant to say that they prefer reading newspapers to increase their knowledge.

Shame on people who think such a person is a national hero!      

Why prostitution must not be legalized in India?

Today I am re posting my facebook note which I wrote on March 9, 2012

Jasvant Singh March 9, 2012
Recently I read an article by Sapna Khanna in “HT Shoppers” which talks about advantages of legalizing prostitution in India.  She claims that sex crimes will be stopped by legalizing prostitution. She thinks that she knows about the subject and she should share her knowledge with world but she is actually sharing her ignorance and stupidity with the world.

Sapna Khanna claims to know about effects of prostitution worldwide and claims that cities where prostitution is legalized sexual crimes are low. It is not true, actually sexual crimes are higher in the cities where prostitution is legalized.  It clearly shows she don't know about real effects of legalizing prostitution.

Let me give you real picture of legalized prostitution:

1.) Once prostitution is legalized, cars will stop seeing any beautiful girl walking on the road and some person will get out of the car and offer a high paying job in his brothel.

2.) Big corporate houses will invest in Brothels and all beautiful women working as receptionist, Human resources, Finances will be harassed to force them to leave their jobs to provide quality manpower to brothel industry.

3.) Government promotes prostitution with help of police because it gets good money as tax from this industry. Any resistance shown by local communities against setting up a brothel will be dealt strictly. Many people who oppose brothel will be put behind bars.

4.) There will be hording of brothels put on all major roads; Advertisements of brothel will be put on taxis plying in the city. This is the scene in all the cities where prostitution is legalized.

5.) Consensual sexual relationship between boys and girls will suffer because girls will be satisfying their sexual needs in brothels serving older and richer guys. Young men will not have access to sex because they can’t pay charges plus entertainment tax of brothel. It will lead to sexual frustration and these men will take up crimes like burglary, murder, kidnap etc. to get money for brothel.  These men would have satisfied their sexual need from girls as girlfriends who would have not be working as prostitutes in brothels had prostitution not been legalized.

6.) Legalizing prostitution will make basic necessity like sex unaffordable and people will have to pay for something like sex which they should get for free.

7.) Government and Big corporates will make money by exploiting both prostitutes and their customers.  Customers will be charged high fee for sex and prostitutes will be charged high rent for space used by prostitutes for providing sexual service.  Countries where prostitution is legalized there are cases where prostitute accumulate so much debt to brothel because of room rent that she need to file for bankruptcy. Effectively customer loses money and prostitutes also lose money. Young boys are sexually frustrated.

8.) Boys know that girls in their city are working as prostitutes and not entertaining their advances because they want them to pay for sex.  These boys who don’t have money will resort to either rape or some other crimes like robbery to satisfy their sexual needs.

9.) World over in cities where prostitution is legalized. There is high crime rates in these cities because people make money by crime to satisfy their fundamental need of sex which is available in brothels only.

It is like British government imposing tax on salt the basic need of people. Some people who used to produce salt will produce it as usual and people who used to consume salt will consume it as usual but government will make money and people will be poorer. Same thing is with legalizing prostitution and taxing it.