What is wrong with Dhruv Rathee?

Recently I came across a very insane video posted by Dhruv Rathee on Ram Navami regarding a scene from Kerala Story 2 where it is shown that a Hindu Girl from Kerala was taken hostage by a Muslim fanatic group by love trap. She is kept hostage her mobile phone is taken away from her and she has no means of contacting outside and seeking help. She is kept locked in a room for two days without food and after that the perpetrator group opens her room and forcefully put beef in her mouth. She says that she will die but will not eat beef. After this incidence she commits suicide leaving note stating names of people responsible for her death.

Arguments has been going on this film for showing wrong facts and being a propaganda film. Many Muslim fundamentalists has claimed that no such incidence has ever occurred and it is all lies propagated by BJP to gain political mileage. I have heard all these arguments and find it to be a valid justification from their side. Their justification might be based on wrong facts but it is a valid defence put up by Islamic fundamentalists. But no one said that their is nothing wrong in forcing a Kerala Hindu girl to eat beef. This is where Islamic fundamentalists stand.

Now I come to Dhruv Rathee video. In his video Dhruv Rathee says that there is nothing wrong in forcing a Kerala Hindu girl to eat beef. He claimed that all Hindu god and goddesses eat beef so Muslim perpetrators did nothing wrong by forcefully putting beef in her mouth. Does Dhruv Rathee know about Freedom of choice of food granted by Constitution of India to citizen of India as fundamental right?

I am sharing a youtube video in response to Dhruv Rathee video exposing his lies. I don't want to share Dhruv Rathee video because that is insane.

Now I want to talk about reasons of Dhruv Rathee posting this video. Some people are saying that he is a lunatic and mentally ill. But to me he look like to be trapped by a gang who is forcing him to make such videos. He is living in Germany away from India where he is forced to live in a location garded by the gang who are focing him to make all these videos. The youtube channels handle is being controlled by this gang. Dhruv Rathee is not allowed to meet anyone without being escorted by members of this gang. He is alive as long as he is cooperating with demand of this gang. The day he shows resistence to demands of this gang, Dhruv Rathee will be found hanging from a ceiling fan like Sushant Singh Rajput.

This is very sorry state of affairs. Let us analyse the way he landed up in such a situation. 

This is a mix of honey trapping and Money trapping. Running a youtube is not as easy as it looks like. You may think that it is as easy as shooting a video on mobile phone followed by editing on computer and uploading to YouTube. But that is not all. For getting people to view your video you need to advertise your video. The cost of advertise is on average 30 rupee per view on YouTube. So if you want to get 2 crore views you need to spend 60 crore rupee on advertisement. Most of the aspiring you-tubers don't have that much money. This is where they get in to the money trap. The gangs with big money get in touch with you-tubers and get into a legal agreement where you-tuber get into an bond of tune of 500 crore rupee with this online gang. The you-tuber is prohibited from making any Facebook, X(formally twitter) or any other social media post without approval of this gang(Agency). 

The agency provides money for promoting YouTube channel and its video. The agency legally owns the brand(You-tuber in this case). The agency spends around 100 crores in promoting the YouTube channel. The person appearing in youtube is reduced to a puppet working at the hand of the agency. The you-tuber is not legally allowed to talk to media without approval of this agency and not allowed to say anything which is not inline with dictate of this agency. If you-tuber goes against wish of this agency then agency files for a lawsuit claiming a damage of 500 crore as per bond signed by the you-tuber. This is legal part of money trapping.

Now start second part of the game. You-tuber is asked to change his location to a place which is controlled physically by the gang. His shooting location moves to a studio which is physically controlled by the gang. His accommodation is moved to a location which is in control of the gang. His movements from accommodation to studio and back from studio to accommodation is controlled by the gang. His mode of communications to outside world like mobile phone are removed and he is taken hostage. 

Now he need to make all the content which this gang want him to make. He is in  constant threat of his life. If he tries to show some restraint in meeting the demand of the gang. He is found hanging from the ceiling fan next day saying that he committed suicide due to depression  cause by lawsuits filed against him.

This is the situation Dhruv Rathee is currently in. His need police help to save his life from the gang who is forcing him to make insane content for the YouTube channel. Dhruv Rathee need our help to get out of this trap.

Good job by UP Fire Service

Yesterday there was a fire in our building and UP Fire service did a commendable job by controlling file in time.

Ours is a private society managed by a private maintenance company and all the fire fighting equipment were found to be not working. The pipes of the fire house were found to be broken when security personals tried to use them. Fire extinguishers were found to be not working. The maintenance team was not trained and they did not even cut PNG supply to control the fire. 

On the other hand UP fire service team arrived promptly and setup their pipeline promptly and controlled the fire. One flat was burnt completely but all other flats were saved, thanks to UP Fire Service.

Some people says that since I work for a private company, I should not be saying anything good about a government company and anything bad about a private company but I think that I should be saying the truth irrespectively of type of the company weather public or private.

Thanks a lot again to UP Fire Service. 

Review of movie Ramsetu

 Last Sunday I watched movie Ramsetu on Amazon prime. I liked the movie. Some sudo secular people say that it was a communal movie and I should not have watched this movie or at least say that it was a bad movie. To them I would like to say that India is a free country and being a citizen of a free country I have right to have my own opinion about any movie. I have every right to say that I liked a movie if I like the movie.

Now let me come to story line. In this movie Akshay Kumar is an archeologist and he works for ASI. He was asked to submit a false report in Supreme Court that Ramsetu was a natural creation and was not created by human. He was given promotion for doing that. Later on he was hired by an international company to do research and prove that Ramsetu was not created by human and dates more than 18000 years old and not 7000 years old as told by protestors who wants to save Ramsetu. Akshay Kumar was given all latest tools and technologies to prove that. But when his finding were contrary to original assignment that company tried to murder him. Being a hero of the movie he survived but in real life many such people get killed who dare to go against will of their secular sponsors. 

Same thing happed in real life when ASI was asked to prove that Babri Masjid was not constructed on top of a demolished temple. When ASI's finding was contrary to the assignment many people were sacked from their job. Evidences which provided proof that Babri Masjid was constructed on top of a demolished temple were destroyed. Many people who did not surrender to their sponsor's whish were murdered. 

In this movie Akshay Kumar gave argument is the court that when industries in Agra can be shutdown to protect Taj Mahal's beauty and route of Delhi Metro can be changed to protect then why Setusamundram project can't be stopped to protect Ramsetu? This argument did not go well with sudo secular people. It is a big blow to their ego. That is why this movie was boycotted by sudo secular people. That is the reason for this movie getting flop on box office.

I don't care if these sudo secular people call me religious fanatic. But if I like a movie then I am going to say that I like the movie.     

Some people in name of Farmers threatening the democracy by violence

 

For more than a month some people pretending to represent interest of Farmers are holding democratically elected government to ransom. These so called farmers tried to threaten the government by creating violence in Delhi. These people needs to dealt strictly. These one Lakh people at most are threatening 130 crore people to ransom. These people are less than 0.01% of our population. How can 0.01% people be allowed to hold nation to ransom.

In our democracy people have right to protest against any law and try to mobilize public opinion. This permission can't be used by any group to threaten democratically elected government to ransom by creating violence.

If you are feeling that I am defending BJP government then you can refer to my earlier post which I wrote when Congress government was in power.

https://jasvantsingh.blogspot.com/2012/09/is-india-heading-nepal-way.html

Amitabh Bachchan promoting non-vegetarianism from Kaun Banega Crorepati show?

Today I was watching Kaun Banega Crorepati show hosted by Amitabh Bachchan. The contestant told that she like Prawn Biryani. Instead of saying that he is a vegetarian, Amitabh Bachchan started saying that he was a non-vegetarian earlier and was much happier that currently being vegetarian. 

Why I have not seen any contestant saying that he is vegetarian because he think killing an animal is wrong. Is it because Sony TV does not allow any contestant to say that. Why being a non-vegetarian is promoted so much that Amitabh Bachchan who is a vegetarian himself is forced to promote non-vegetarianism. 

These are the vegetarian who promote killing of cows for food in name of free choice of food but when asked why don't they protest against Nagalang criminalizing killing of Dogs for food say that being a vegetarian they must welcome Nagaland banning killing of dogs. 

I don't think Amitabh Bachchan and contestants speech is extempore. I think their speech is scripted to promote non-vegetarianism and alcohol.      

Do only SC/ST feel bad when called by their cast?

 Today Sadhvi Pragya Singh said that only SC/ST feel bad when they are called by cast and other cast don't feel bad when called by their cast. 

It is not true that Brahmin don't feel bad when they are called pandit. I have seen 50 years old priest fighting with a 80 years old lady because she called him "oye pandit" instead of calling him pandit ji. He should not have felt bad considering age of the lady she was of the priest's mothers age. But still he called many bad words for the lady of his mothers age just because she called him by his cast. What matter is the intentions of the person by calling a person by cast. I have seen people calling SC/ST as SC/ST and people on protesting but I have seen people protesting when called SC/ST also.

If person is a teacher and he is son of a sweeper then why do we call him a sweeper? He is not a sweeper but a teacher and maybe better teacher then other teachers of the school. Still why do we want to call him a sweeper? If you praise him for working hard and becoming a teacher despite being a son of a sweeper then he will not feel bad but if you say that he is a bad teacher because he is son of a sweeper then he will feel bad.

I already gave an incidence where a Brahmin felt bad when he was called by name of his cast.

Hypocrisy of liberal educated class

I am seeing that vocal critic of Yogi Aditya Nath for banning cow slaughtering are silent on Nagaland banning killing and selling of dogs meat. Now same people are becoming animal lovers and welcoming this decisions. When I talked to one such person he said to me that he is a vegetarian so he welcome this decision. When I asked him then why he was not happy when Yogi Aditya Nath banned cow slaughtering then he got angry and said Yogi Aditya Nath is communal.

I fail to understand why dog is an animal and cow is not. Why???????

I am not talking about any politician of a riksha puller. I am talking about educated software engineers who think that uneducated and communal poor people don't deserve a voting right.