Akshay Kumar's donation of 90 Lakhs for drought relief

Film actor Akshay Kumar has announced donation of 90 Lakh rupee for drought relief in Maharastra. Many people have suddenly started posting on facebook against so called tax evasion by Akshay Kumar. What have happened recently? Is Akshay Kumar been named in some panama leeks? I don't remember any official or unofficial report coming out recently which have exposed Akshay Kumar. So why suddenly Akshay Kumar has become a villain? What have he done recently to attract such comments.

Only thing I see have hurt people is his donation of 90 Lakh rupee for drought relief. This act have hurt lakhs of people who think that they are highest income tax payers despite being in lowest 5% of the income group and are biggest philanthropist because they gave 10 rupee to a beggar some 10 years back and no one can beat their record. These people label people donating money to temples as selfish because these people are buying mercy for their sins from god. It looks like saints are found only drinking in a bar with their friends; any person who give money to a needy person is corrupt and want to buy forgiveness for his sins. Now by giving 90 Lakh rupee for drought relief in Maharastra Akshay Kumar have proved that he is a corrupt person. If he is not corrupt then why he is not enjoying his money in bars with his friends just like honest actors like Amitabh Bachchan, Amir Khan and Shahrukh Khan?

No one can be more philanthropic than a person who had given 10 rupee to a beggar some 10 years back. If someone tries to prove him wrong, then that person will attract that kind of hate which Akshay Kumar is facing. If Akshay Kumar is such a big tax evader then why did I not hear about that before? No new information from income tax department has come out recently.

People doing good thing should keep doing good thing despite being disliked by selfish people. These people want to believe that they are best people despite being highly corrupt and selfish. If someone breaks that image of themselves they start talking against him. So Akshay Kumar, don't worry about these people and keep doing good work.         

Decreasing population of Hindu's and threat of Mugalistan

According to news report at the following link :

http://hindi.webdunia.com/national-hindi-news/india-s-population-muslim-youth-indian-muslim-116011300075_1.html

population of Hindus is declining at a very alarming rate. This is a very dangerous situation Hindus are facing. If we are unable to maintain our population then we will not be able to protect our assets. It happened in Kashmir where Hindus were in minority where numbers are concerned but very well placed as far as property was concerned. They were thrown out of Kashmir my Muslim majority and now living in shelter houses in Jammu. This is going to happen in every piece of land where Hindus are going to become a minority. There is already a plan out to create a nation called Mugalistan which will comprise of Jammu & Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Haryana, Uttar Pradesh, Bihar and Bangal. This Mugalistan will not be bound by constitution written by B.R. Ambedkar where minority will have special privileges but they will write their own constitution and Hindus will not have any rights there.

Why am I concerned?

I am concerned because my house falls in this proposed area of Mugalistan. My only security against this Mugalistan is that Hindus are in majority in this geographical area. But now that is being shattered because population of Hindus is decreasing. Now threat of Mugalistan looks very real.

Is converting to Islam a solution?

Some people say that they will convert to Islam and enjoy their property in Mugalistan like Hindus of Pakistan, who converted to Islam, are enjoying. It is not true because I heard a story of a Punjabi Brahmin family who was left in Pakistan and converted to Islam for their protection. One of my colleagues told me that when they were young one person came to their house in Delhi and told him that he is Muhamad Yasin and he want to meet his father. When his father came Muhamad Yasin told his father that he is son of his grandfather's brother and he came to India to disburse remains of his father in Ganga. When Muhamad Yasin's father was dying he told to his son that his actual name is Ram Prasad Sharma and he had to convert to Islam to protect his family and he could not live like a Hindu but want to die as a Hindu. He requested his son not to bury his dead body but to burn it and disburse his remains in Ganga in India. He also told his son that after converting to Islam his life was not peaceful as expected; more than half of his property was taken as donation while converting to Islam. He was forced to give good amount of money to Masjid on every Muslim festival. He was left with only 20% of his original wealth.

This is what happens after someone converts to Islam. It is all about land and money and not about religion. Muslims are not interested in converting Hindus to Islam but to capture their money and land. Initially they lure Hindus with promise of a luxurious life after converting to Islam but once you are trapped they will extort last penny out of you.

Who is responsible for decreasing population of Hindus?

Only Hindus who are not ready to shoulder responsibility of raising two children are responsible for decrease of Hindu population. People say, “what is point in having more children whom you can't feed”. It matters how much money do you give to your children than how may children you have. I would like to say that Kashmiri Hindus had every wealth and lacked only in number and now living life of penury. Converting to Islam is not a solution as describe earlier. I see lots of Hindus who are having only one child and don't want to have second child because they think that they can give to society better than another children. Of course they are talking about money. I don't like talking about it but today I want to ask these people how much money they are contributing to society. I am, after shouldering responsibility of raising 2 children, paying all taxes honestly is contributing 40,000 rupee per year to uplift life of poor people for last 8 years. How much these progressive people who don't believe in just producing children are contributing? Of course they have more resources left with them because they have fewer children.

People say that I make a lot of money. I can't discuss my salary in public because it is confidential and I don't make as much money as people think. I want to say that people who are driving more expensive cars than mine, spending more money on luxurious dining and travel and not having responsibility of 2 children are not able to contribute as much as I am able to do.

What is the solution?

The solution to this problem is that Hindu men should stand up and take responsibility of raising two children. It is not that Hindu women are not ready to bear second child but Hindu men are to ready to raise second child. Hindu men are being too selfish and a too selfish society can survive. Well to do people should contribute for welfare of poor Hindus so that they don't fall to allurements of Muslims. This way we can save ourselves from suffering in Mugalistan. 

IIT fee hiked to 2 lakhs per year

Today HRD minister Smriti Irani took two decisions

1.    Making education in IITs free for SC/ST and physically  challenged 

2.    Increasing fee for IITs from 90 thousands to 2 Lakhs

Regarding first decision I would like to say that it is investment on uplifting the poor and if 2000 SC/ST students are studying in IITs then it will cost 2000x2 Lakhs = 40 crore per year. If only 50% of this goes to deserving candidates then also I will say that it is right investment. With kind of budget we are having for union of India it is a very small amount. With this investment we are not lowering standard of education like in case of reservation. We are uplifting standard of education by investing some money. Giving grant to students of most premier institutions of our country will take our country forward.

Now regarding second decision I would like to say that many of engineers produced by IITs takes jobs abroad and don't repay investment done on them by paying income tax in India. Smriti Irani has also said that all general candidates can apply for an interest free loan for paying the fee and that too without any collateral. It means any student deserving admission in IIT can walk into any bank with his/her report card and walk out with a loan for his/her education. If this is reality then the students of IIT will at least repay cost of education before leaving India and starting enriching a rich country's coffer with their income tax. On deserving candidate will be at disadvantage because getting a loan is as easy as walking in with his/her report card and walking out with loan approved. If it is really true.  

Income tax and budget of 2016

Yesterday Union Budget of India 2016 was produced in parliament. People are discussing impact of the budget. I thought that I should also discuss impact of budget on people of India.

In this budget finance minister has not increased tax slabs, not reduced income tax rates but increased service tax from 14% to 15%. The finance minister has increased allocation for farmers, healthcare and education.

People care complaining that why our tax money is being spent on farmers instead of being spent on us. They are making excuse that the money spent on farmers and healthcare actually land up in being wasted in corruption therefore government should not spend money there. The problem of corruption is in every department. Should government stop building roads in cities also just because there will be corruption with funds being allocated for roads? The answer to this question is no because tax payer want roads in city for himself. But government should stop constructing roads in villages because it leads to corruption and easiest and proper solution to corruption stop spending money on villages. Government should save money by closing down schools and hospitals because these places are center of corruption according to educated tax payers of India. These tax payer want reduction in their taxes by forcing poor people out of schools and sick people out of Hospital. According to them corruption happens only when government tries to spend money on poor people. If government construct roads in city it is corruption free but if government construct roads in villages there is 99% corruption.

I feel that government's efforts are in right direction and government should focus on uplifting the poor farmers. Government should focus on removing corruption from social work done by government. India's current condition where 90% of wealth is held by 5% people is not good. We need better wealth distribution. Government is on right track. I wish them success in their work.

Fake eyewitness

Today one of my colleagues forwarded me a news link which claims that Mahisasur (the daemon king) is worshipped in South India. When I told him that, "I have been to Mysore and lived in Bangalore for one year and never saw anyone worshiping Mahisasur. I did not even hear that Mahisasur being worshiped anywhere at all. I had many Dravidian friends and no one told me that they have any respect for Mahisasur." he told me that he had been to Chennai and he saw people worshiping Mahisasur. When I asked him to give details of location in Chennai where he saw people worshiping Mahisasur he was not able to give it. He later told me that he saw it in Begampet, which he later retracted and said that Begampet is in Hydrabad and not in Chennai.

The interesting question is that did he saw someone worshiping Mahisasur in Chennai or he is making false stories based on the news article? Anyone who has not been to south India can believe in this story if someone says that he had been to south India and himself saw Mahisasur being worshiped there by his own eyes. But this might very well be a work of fiction based on a news article to impress his friends about his knowledge (false knowledge). Today I came to know that you should not trust so called eyewitness because their version can be based on a false news item rather than being based on their own personal experience.  

Following is part of news item first published in Telegraph and later published by abplive.com . This news article is based on Smriti Irani (Human Resources Development Minister, Government of India)'s speech in parliament.

MAHISHASUR

Irani referred to celebrations of Mahishasur — the demon slayed by Goddess Durga — in JNU, and wondered whether that would be tolerated in Calcutta.

Fact check: The “demon” is celebrated in many parts of southern India, and some scholars have suggested his popular, dark-skinned depiction in contrast to the fair-skinned Durga is a pointer to an Aryan-Dravidian divide. Mysore, Karnataka’s second-largest city, is an anglicised version of Mahishuru — which means the “abode of Mahishasura” in Kannada.

Based on this news item my colleague constructed story of him seeing worship of Mahisasur by his own eyes. These kinds of eyewitness are real culprit of dividing the nation. These people spread rumors which divide the country. We need to be careful of these kinds of people.

I again confirmed with one of my south Indian friend if Mahisasur is worshiped in south India. He told me that south India is big area and he can't deny if in some remote area a few people worship Mahisasur but as far as his knowledge about south India the answer is No, south Indian people don't worship Mahisasur or Ravana.

At the following link one person analysed telegraph's post in detail.

http://www.opindia.com/2016/02/a-fact-check-on-the-telegraphs-fact-check/

Haryana burning in fire of reservation

Past few days Haryana is seeing violent protest by Jat community demanding reservation in government educational institutions and government jobs. These kinds of reservations are against right of equal opportunities granted by constitution. Some people are showing their power to blackmail the government and killing meritocracy.

I accept all this arguments but want to remind you about management quotas in private educational institutions. Private educational institutions produce 75% of total doctors produced in India. 50% of these seats are reserved for relatives of management committee. This reservation for rich people is approved by government and judiciary. This reservation is hitting meritocracy harder than cast based reservation in government collages and jobs. Why government and judiciary fail to take any action when rich people show their power and demand 50% reservation for their children in schools and colleges? Why no one express unhappiness on this sorry state of affairs? Why this reservation for rich people allowed in name of freedom to run private business?

No private business must be allowed to discriminate between customers. If someone opens an insurance company or a bank, can we allow him/her to charge different premium or interest rates based on cast of the customer? The answer is no because right to run private business don't allow anyone to discriminate between people. Similarly private educational institutions must be prevented from discriminating students based on management seats and public seats. When general seat students fail to get admission at 95% marks, management seat student get admission at 55% marks. These management seat students produce incompetent doctors and engineers and we have to bear with these incompetent people. Government and Judiciary need to rise up to task to restoring true meritocracy in India where no seats are reserved to rich people and education is provided to every talented and hardworking person of India irrespective of financial condition of his/her parents.

I earlier also wrote my opinion in matter earlier also at following link:

http://jasvantsingh.blogspot.in/2016/02/management-quota-in-education.html

Anti India protest in JNU

Few days back there was a protest in support of terrorist Afzal Guru who was hanged in case of attack on Indian parliament. In this protest anti India slogans were raised. Next day ABVP protested against anti-national elements. The teachers of JNU did not support protest against anti-national elements because they did not want to get involved in politics.

Now Delhi police have acted against these anti national elements and booked JNUSU president Kanehya in case of sedition. The same professors who did not want to get into student politics are now protesting in support of anti-national people. Students who are protesting in support of anti-national people are not doing it because they want to do it but because they want to get good grades in their exam and they have to support their professors for that. The problem is not with students but with teachers of JNU. Teachers of JNU are anti-national and getting involved in anti-national activities is a mandatory criterion for scoring good marks.