Amitabh Bachchan promoting non-vegetarianism from Kaun Banega Crorepati show?

Today I was watching Kaun Banega Crorepati show hosted by Amitabh Bachchan. The contestant told that she like Prawn Biryani. Instead of saying that he is a vegetarian, Amitabh Bachchan started saying that he was a non-vegetarian earlier and was much happier that currently being vegetarian. 

Why I have not seen any contestant saying that he is vegetarian because he think killing an animal is wrong. Is it because Sony TV does not allow any contestant to say that. Why being a non-vegetarian is promoted so much that Amitabh Bachchan who is a vegetarian himself is forced to promote non-vegetarianism. 

These are the vegetarian who promote killing of cows for food in name of free choice of food but when asked why don't they protest against Nagalang criminalizing killing of Dogs for food say that being a vegetarian they must welcome Nagaland banning killing of dogs. 

I don't think Amitabh Bachchan and contestants speech is extempore. I think their speech is scripted to promote non-vegetarianism and alcohol.      

Do only SC/ST feel bad when called by their cast?

 Today Sadhvi Pragya Singh said that only SC/ST feel bad when they are called by cast and other cast don't feel bad when called by their cast. 

It is not true that Brahmin don't feel bad when they are called pandit. I have seen 50 years old priest fighting with a 80 years old lady because she called him "oye pandit" instead of calling him pandit ji. He should not have felt bad considering age of the lady she was of the priest's mothers age. But still he called many bad words for the lady of his mothers age just because she called him by his cast. What matter is the intentions of the person by calling a person by cast. I have seen people calling SC/ST as SC/ST and people on protesting but I have seen people protesting when called SC/ST also.

If person is a teacher and he is son of a sweeper then why do we call him a sweeper? He is not a sweeper but a teacher and maybe better teacher then other teachers of the school. Still why do we want to call him a sweeper? If you praise him for working hard and becoming a teacher despite being a son of a sweeper then he will not feel bad but if you say that he is a bad teacher because he is son of a sweeper then he will feel bad.

I already gave an incidence where a Brahmin felt bad when he was called by name of his cast.

Hypocrisy of liberal educated class

I am seeing that vocal critic of Yogi Aditya Nath for banning cow slaughtering are silent on Nagaland banning killing and selling of dogs meat. Now same people are becoming animal lovers and welcoming this decisions. When I talked to one such person he said to me that he is a vegetarian so he welcome this decision. When I asked him then why he was not happy when Yogi Aditya Nath banned cow slaughtering then he got angry and said Yogi Aditya Nath is communal.

I fail to understand why dog is an animal and cow is not. Why???????

I am not talking about any politician of a riksha puller. I am talking about educated software engineers who think that uneducated and communal poor people don't deserve a voting right. 

Nirbhaya case guilty finally hanged today

Nirbya case guilty were finally hanged today. This will give a message that any heinous crime like rape and murder will be punished severely and guilty will not be spared. There has been a lot of delay due to complex judicial loopholes but finally justice  is delivered.

Kejriwal Elected as Delhi's Chief Minister once again

Yesterday results of Delhi state government was declared. Arvind Kejriwal's Aam Adami Party won 62 seats out of 70 seats, BJP got 8 seats and congress got 0 seats. As voting percentage goes AAP's vote share declined from 54% in 2015 to 53.57% in 2020 which is not significant despite anti incumbency factor. BJP's share increased from 32% in 2015 to 38.51% in 2020. Congress's share declined from 10% in 2015 to 4.26% 2020.

I accept this mandate as BJP's defeat and will not blame Delhi's voter being bad mentality voter. We must respect voter's mandate and not blame him as bad mentality voter weather he is voter of Delhi or Uttar Pradesh and Bihar. You can't say Delhi's voter is good because he voted your favorite party to power but Uttar Pradesh's voter is a bad mentality voter because he voted for a party which you don't like.

If Arvind Kejriwal was able to beat anti incumbency factor with such a huge majority then it mean he did some good work in last 5 years. On the other hand BJP was not able to convince people of Delhi that their local leaders are capable of performing better than Kejriwal. There might be internal fight between BJP leader's because of that BJP was not able to come up with a chief ministerial candidate. Local election need to have good local leadership. BJP was not able to provide good local leadership.

I see Dr. Harshvardhan being a good candidate for chief minister's post but he is thrown out into a corner by BJP. This might be because Narender Modi like sycophants and not leaders who have standing of their own.These kind of favoritism can destroy and organization.