Good job by UP Fire Service

Yesterday there was a fire in our building and UP Fire service did a commendable job by controlling file in time.

Ours is a private society managed by a private maintenance company and all the fire fighting equipment were found to be not working. The pipes of the fire house were found to be broken when security personals tried to use them. Fire extinguishers were found to be not working. The maintenance team was not trained and they did not even cut PNG supply to control the fire. 

On the other hand UP fire service team arrived promptly and setup their pipeline promptly and controlled the fire. One flat was burnt completely but all other flats were saved, thanks to UP Fire Service.

Some people says that since I work for a private company, I should not be saying anything good about a government company and anything bad about a private company but I think that I should be saying the truth irrespectively of type of the company weather public or private.

Thanks a lot again to UP Fire Service. 

Review of movie Ramsetu

 Last Sunday I watched movie Ramsetu on Amazon prime. I liked the movie. Some sudo secular people say that it was a communal movie and I should not have watched this movie or at least say that it was a bad movie. To them I would like to say that India is a free country and being a citizen of a free country I have right to have my own opinion about any movie. I have every right to say that I liked a movie if I like the movie.

Now let me come to story line. In this movie Akshay Kumar is an archeologist and he works for ASI. He was asked to submit a false report in Supreme Court that Ramsetu was a natural creation and was not created by human. He was given promotion for doing that. Later on he was hired by an international company to do research and prove that Ramsetu was not created by human and dates more than 18000 years old and not 7000 years old as told by protestors who wants to save Ramsetu. Akshay Kumar was given all latest tools and technologies to prove that. But when his finding were contrary to original assignment that company tried to murder him. Being a hero of the movie he survived but in real life many such people get killed who dare to go against will of their secular sponsors. 

Same thing happed in real life when ASI was asked to prove that Babri Masjid was not constructed on top of a demolished temple. When ASI's finding was contrary to the assignment many people were sacked from their job. Evidences which provided proof that Babri Masjid was constructed on top of a demolished temple were destroyed. Many people who did not surrender to their sponsor's whish were murdered. 

In this movie Akshay Kumar gave argument is the court that when industries in Agra can be shutdown to protect Taj Mahal's beauty and route of Delhi Metro can be changed to protect then why Setusamundram project can't be stopped to protect Ramsetu? This argument did not go well with sudo secular people. It is a big blow to their ego. That is why this movie was boycotted by sudo secular people. That is the reason for this movie getting flop on box office.

I don't care if these sudo secular people call me religious fanatic. But if I like a movie then I am going to say that I like the movie.     

Some people in name of Farmers threatening the democracy by violence

 

For more than a month some people pretending to represent interest of Farmers are holding democratically elected government to ransom. These so called farmers tried to threaten the government by creating violence in Delhi. These people needs to dealt strictly. These one Lakh people at most are threatening 130 crore people to ransom. These people are less than 0.01% of our population. How can 0.01% people be allowed to hold nation to ransom.

In our democracy people have right to protest against any law and try to mobilize public opinion. This permission can't be used by any group to threaten democratically elected government to ransom by creating violence.

If you are feeling that I am defending BJP government then you can refer to my earlier post which I wrote when Congress government was in power.

https://jasvantsingh.blogspot.com/2012/09/is-india-heading-nepal-way.html

Amitabh Bachchan promoting non-vegetarianism from Kaun Banega Crorepati show?

Today I was watching Kaun Banega Crorepati show hosted by Amitabh Bachchan. The contestant told that she like Prawn Biryani. Instead of saying that he is a vegetarian, Amitabh Bachchan started saying that he was a non-vegetarian earlier and was much happier that currently being vegetarian. 

Why I have not seen any contestant saying that he is vegetarian because he think killing an animal is wrong. Is it because Sony TV does not allow any contestant to say that. Why being a non-vegetarian is promoted so much that Amitabh Bachchan who is a vegetarian himself is forced to promote non-vegetarianism. 

These are the vegetarian who promote killing of cows for food in name of free choice of food but when asked why don't they protest against Nagalang criminalizing killing of Dogs for food say that being a vegetarian they must welcome Nagaland banning killing of dogs. 

I don't think Amitabh Bachchan and contestants speech is extempore. I think their speech is scripted to promote non-vegetarianism and alcohol.      

Do only SC/ST feel bad when called by their cast?

 Today Sadhvi Pragya Singh said that only SC/ST feel bad when they are called by cast and other cast don't feel bad when called by their cast. 

It is not true that Brahmin don't feel bad when they are called pandit. I have seen 50 years old priest fighting with a 80 years old lady because she called him "oye pandit" instead of calling him pandit ji. He should not have felt bad considering age of the lady she was of the priest's mothers age. But still he called many bad words for the lady of his mothers age just because she called him by his cast. What matter is the intentions of the person by calling a person by cast. I have seen people calling SC/ST as SC/ST and people on protesting but I have seen people protesting when called SC/ST also.

If person is a teacher and he is son of a sweeper then why do we call him a sweeper? He is not a sweeper but a teacher and maybe better teacher then other teachers of the school. Still why do we want to call him a sweeper? If you praise him for working hard and becoming a teacher despite being a son of a sweeper then he will not feel bad but if you say that he is a bad teacher because he is son of a sweeper then he will feel bad.

I already gave an incidence where a Brahmin felt bad when he was called by name of his cast.

Hypocrisy of liberal educated class

I am seeing that vocal critic of Yogi Aditya Nath for banning cow slaughtering are silent on Nagaland banning killing and selling of dogs meat. Now same people are becoming animal lovers and welcoming this decisions. When I talked to one such person he said to me that he is a vegetarian so he welcome this decision. When I asked him then why he was not happy when Yogi Aditya Nath banned cow slaughtering then he got angry and said Yogi Aditya Nath is communal.

I fail to understand why dog is an animal and cow is not. Why???????

I am not talking about any politician of a riksha puller. I am talking about educated software engineers who think that uneducated and communal poor people don't deserve a voting right. 

Nirbhaya case guilty finally hanged today

Nirbya case guilty were finally hanged today. This will give a message that any heinous crime like rape and murder will be punished severely and guilty will not be spared. There has been a lot of delay due to complex judicial loopholes but finally justice  is delivered.